• Home
• About GeneWatch
• GM Crops and Food
• GM animals
• New Genetic Engineering Techniques
  • Press releases
  • Genetic Technology (Precision Breeding) Act
• Human Genetics
• Laboratory and Industrial Use
• Research Agendas and Patenting
• Trade issues
• Biological Weapons
• Publications
• Press Releases

You are in New Genetic Engineering Techniques → External links

External links

Recent Articles

• The Greens: SCIENTIFIC CRITIQUE OF LEOPOLDINA AND EASAC STATEMENTS ON GENOME EDITED PLANTS IN THE EU (April 2021)
  

• EC study on new genomic techniques (29th April 2021)
  

• Gene Tip: Gene Drives at Tipping Points - Precautionary Technology Assessment and Governance of New Approaches to Genetically Modified Animal and Plant Populations (April 2020)
  

• GMWatch: Science supports need to subject gene-edited plants to strict safety assessments (20th November 2019)
  

• TWN: Gene drives: A summary of legal and regulatory issues (Oct 2019)
  

• TWN: Key elements in a legal and regulatory framework for gene drive organisms (October 2019)
  

• US RTK: Gene Editing Mishaps Highlight Need for FDA Oversight (17th October 2019)
  

• CSS, VDR, ENSSER: Gene Drives
  

• MaxPlanckSociety: The Insect Allies program - genetically modified viruses in agriculture (20th September 2019)
  

• Friends of the Earth: Gene-edited animals will intensify factory farming and the climate crisis, could harm human health (17th September 2019)
  

• Corporate Europe Observatory: US pressure on EU to de-regulate new GM (24th July 2019)
  

• STEPS Centre: Choreographed Consensus: The stifling of dissent at CRISPRcon 2019 (28th June 2019)
  

• GMWatch: Coming to your dinner plate soon? (17th June 2019)
  

• Friends of the Earth: Gene-edited organisms in agriculture: Risks and unexpected consequences (September 2018)
  

• IATP: Regulate new GE techniques? U.S. (never) vs. EU (yes) (8th August 2018)
  

• ECJ: Organisms obtained by mutagenesis are GMOs and are, in principle, subject to the obligations laid down by the GMO Directive (25th July 2018)
  

• Report of the Swiss Federal Ethics Committee on Non-Human Biotechnology (ECNH): Precaution in the environmental field: Ethical requirements for the regulation of new biotechnologies (May 2018)
  

• Keine neue Gentechnik durch die Hintertuere!
  

• Court of Justice of the European Union PR: According to Advocate General Bobek, organisms obtained by mutagenesis are, in principle, exempted from the obligations in the Genetically Modified Organisms Directive (18th January 2018)
  

• ECJ: OPINION OF ADVOCATE GENERAL BOBEK: Case C‑528/16 (18th January 2018)
  

• IFOAM: The organic food and farming movement calls for the regulation of new genetic engineering techniques as GMOs (15th January 2018)
  

• IFOAM: Position Paper: Compatibility of Breeding Techniques in Organic Systems (January 2017)
  

• Gene Drive Files
  

• Friends of the Earth Australia: Emerging Tech Project (Video) (November 2017)
  

• BfR: Risikowahrnehmung von Genome Editing: Vorbehalte und großes Informationsbedürfnis vorhanden (24th October 2017)
  

• TACD: Reporting back on the 'Modern Biotechnology in Agriculture' conference (11th October 2017)
  

• Steinbrecher & Paul (2017) New Genetic Engineering Techniques: Precaution, Risk, and the Need to Develop Prior Societal Technology Assessment
  

• African Centre for Biodiversity: DECEPTION OR DISHONESTY? A critical review of the Academy of Science in South Africa’s (ASSAf’s) report on second generation GMOs (22nd June 2017)
  

• The Greens: New GMOs (15th June 2017)
  

• Australian Academy of Sciences: SYNTHETIC GENE DRIVES IN AUSTRALIA: IMPLICATIONS OF EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES (May 2017)
  

• ETC Group: 160 Global Groups Call for Moratorium on New Genetic Extinction Technology at UN Convention (5th December 2016)
  

• Friends of the Earth: Organic standards will exclude next generation of GMOs (21st November 2016)
  

• VLOG: VLOG fordert strikte Regeln fuer neue Gentechnikverfahren (9th November 2016)
  

• L'inf'OGM: Genetically modifying a plant is far from harmless (30th September 2016)
  

• L'inf'OGM: Genetically modifying a plant is far from being harmless (follow-up) (30th September 2016)
  

• Nuffield Council on Bioethics: Genome editing: an ethical review (30th September 2016)
  

• Transatlantic Consumer Dialogue: Resolution on consumer concerns about new genetic engineering techniques (7th September 2016)
  

• Transatlantic Consumer Dialogue PR: New policy resolution on consumer concerns about new genetic engineering techniques (7th September 2016)
  

• Friends of the Eearth: Permanently changing a species: What could go wrong? (8th June 2016)
  

• UCCSNAL: Open letter fron the Union of Concerned Scientists on New Technologies (10th May 2016)
  

• IATP: U.S. tries to export its biotech deregulatory regime (2nd May 2016)
  

• Heinemann (2016): Expert scientific opinion on the status of certain new techniques of genetic modification under Directive 2001/18/EC
  

• Independent Science News: God's Red Pencil? CRISPR and The Three Myths of Precise Genome Editing (25th April 2016)
  

• TestBiotech: Seed giants active around new methods of genetic engineering (2nd March 2016)
  

• in External links
  Risk Bites: Can we eliminate diseases like Zika, dengue and malaria using gene drives? (30th November 2015)
  

• Greenpeace: Application of the EU and Cartagena definitions of a GMO to the classification of plants developed by cisgenesis and gene-editing techniques (November 2015)
  

• Corporate Europe Observatory: TTIP: released emails show biotech, seeds on the trade talks table (2nd July 2015)
  

• InfOGM: EU - According to a lobby group : new plant breeding techniques do not give rise to GMOs (29th September 2014)
  

↑ Top