Research Agendas and Patenting
In both human genetics and GM crops and foods, questions about the research that is conducted and how it is controlled and shaped are important for society to consider. Supporting research in one area usually means research in another will be limited because funding has to be prioritised. Allowing patents on basic research can restrict who can use the knowledge to develop new treatments or crops. Encouraging research that has commercially benefits will skew research towards areas where discoveries can be patentable, because this is what industry encourages.
GeneWatch believes there should be more public involvement in making decisions about research priorities. We also believe that patents should not be allowed on genes because they are discoveries, not inventions; that by monopolising knowledge at such a basic level research is hampered; and that research is biased towards patentable discoveries rather than being prioritised for health or sustainable food production.
Resources
- Press articles
- The Observer: Gene wars: the last-ditch battle over who owns the rights to our DNA (21st April 2013)
- FT: Science: Custodians of the code (26th March 2013)
- The Guardian: Europe 'has failed to learn from environmental disasters' (23rd January 2013)
- Salem-News.com: Family Farmers Travel to Washington D.C. to Take on Monsanto (6th January 2012)
- Reuters: Food safety group calls for court to limit GMO seed patents (10th December 2012)
- Reuters: Supreme Court to decide if human genes patentable (30th November 2012)
- Bloomberg: DuPont Sends in Former Cops to Enforce Seed Patents: Commodities (28th November 2012)
- TheGuardian: Genetically modifying and patenting seeds isn't the answer (9th October 2012)
- Nature News: Monsanto may lose GM soya royalties throughout Brazil (15th June 2012)
-
GigaOm: Famous judge spikes Apple-Google case, calls patent system "dysfunctional" (8th June 2012)
US judge criticises patent system.
- The Nation: How Our Genetic Maps Are Being Sold to the Highest Bidder (6th June 2012)
- The Scientist: Gene Patent Stirs Controversy (4th June 2012)
- BBC: UK bioscience industry gets GBP250m cash boost from government (24th May 2012)
- BioTechniques: Gene Patent Case Heads Back to Court (14th May 2012)
- The Globe and Mail: Why science has to promise profits (23rd April 2012)
- The Guardian: It's time for a register of interests for science academics (10th April 2012)
- Reports
-
Local Food Systems in Europe: Case studies from five countries and what they imply for policy and practice (August 2010)
23rd August 2010
-
Bioscience for Life?
6th April 2010
-
Summary & Conclusions: History of proposal for data-sharing without consent
26th January 2009
-
History of the proposal for data-sharing without consent
26th January 2009
-
Local Food Systems in Europe: Case studies from five countries and what they imply for policy and practice (August 2010)
- Press Releases
- GeneWatch UK PR: Taxpayers' R&D spend needs more accountability: stop wasting it on PR for GM crops 23rd November 2012
- GeneWatch PR: Bioeconomy a science fantasy: new GeneWatch report 25th March 2010
- GeneWatch PR: Brown's Science Speech (27th February 2009) 27th February 2009
- GeneWatch PR: Prime Minister unscientific about science: GeneWatch UK response to PM's speech on science and the economy 3rd November 2006
- GeneWatch PR: New controls needed to maintain independence of science: research shows scientists fail to disclose financial interests in the journal, Nature 2nd November 2006
- Briefings
- GM Debate Briefing - GM Research: Who Decides? 1st June 2003
- Consultation responses
-
GeneWatch UK: Response to BIS consultation on Agri-Tech Strategy
23rd November 2012
- GeneWatch Submission to House of Lords Science and Technology Committee inquiry on research funding priorities (September 2009) 10th September 2009
- Submission to the DIUS Science and Society consultation 16th October 2008
- GeneWatch UK submission to the Treasury's Cooksey review of health service research 27th July 2006
- Genomics versus public health research - note for Treasury 7th September 2004
- Submission to Government consultation on science and innovation 30th April 2004
- Response to Wanless review of public health 14th November 2003
-
GeneWatch UK: Response to BIS consultation on Agri-Tech Strategy
- Links
-
European Environment Agency: Late lessons from early warnings: science, precaution, innovation (23rd January 2013)
Includes: Chapter 19 Hungry for innovation: pathways from GM crops to agroecology. David A. Quist, Jack A. Heinemann, Anne I. Myhr, Iulie Aslaksen and Silvio Funtowicz
- Nuffield Council on Bioethics: Emerging biotechnologies: technology, choice and the public good (December 2012)
- US patent ruling: Myriad BRCA1/2 patents (March 2010)
-
Intellectual Property: The many faces of the public domain.
This book contains a chapter by GeneWatch's Helen Wallace and Sue Mayer.
- Agriculture and Environment Biotechnology Commission (AEBC) - Home Page
-
European Environment Agency: Late lessons from early warnings: science, precaution, innovation (23rd January 2013)
