Genes and Marketing
Most genetic tests are currently only available through specialist genetic testing services in the NHS, where they are mainly used to diagnose genetic disorders or identify people whose children might inherit such disorders. However, a number of companies are already looking at ways of expanding the market for genetic tests by selling them on the internet, in high street stores, through private GPs or via alternative healthcare providers.
Scientists from the Netherlands and from the US National Office of Public Health Genomics have published an investigation of seven companies highlighted by GeneWatch as selling misleading gene tests. They concluded that "There is insufficient scientific evidence to conclude that genomic profiles are useful in measuring genetic risk for common diseases or in developing personalized diet and lifestyle recommendations for disease prevention".
UK scientists and medics have also warned about the lack of regulation of tests which try to predict the risk of disease in healthy people, including genetic susceptibility tests. A report by Sense about Science has warned that "There is a growing business selling new genetic tests based on very preliminary research - the evidence is far too flimsy to be accepted by evidence-based medical practice".
Genetic testing services require customers to provide a sample of their DNA (usually using a simple mouth swab) which is then sent to a laboratory. The laboratory will look for rare mutations or common variations in the person's genetic make-up. Customers may then receive any or all of the following:
- predictions about their, or their children's, risk of future illness;
- health advice about their lifestyle or which vitamin supplements or medicines to take;
- products that are claimed to be tailored to their individual genetic make-up.
Genetic tests are not regulated there is no independent assessment of the claims made by commercial companies. This means that people could easily be misled about their health. Read about the problems here.
Please note that information about specific companies may change after the publication date. For example, the US company Great Smokies Diagnostics Laboratory (GSDL) has changed its name to Genova Diagnostics. The UK company Health Interlink has asked us to point out that it severed its ties with GSDL over three years ago, shortly after its tests were launched.
Recent Articles
-
in ReportsYour Diet Tailored to your Genes: Preventing Diseases or Misleading Marketing
16th May 2006
Resources
- Briefings
- GeneWatch response to the consultation on the Medical Devices Directives 4th July 2008
- Examples of genes in tests marketed by Genetic Health (UK) 6th November 2007
- GeneWatch UK response to MHRA consultation 29th October 2007
-
Genetic Health: evidence to the MHRA (Appendix)
28th October 2007
- Genetic Health: evidence to the MHRA 28th October 2007
-
Briefing 35: Nutrigenomics: the future of nutrition?
1st March 2006
-
Three reasons not to buy the NicoTestTM genetic test
7th January 2005
-
Briefing 28: Genetic Tests and Health
1st September 2004
-
MPs' Briefing: Human Genetics No. 4: Human genetic testing and the influence of the pharmaceutical industry
1st September 2004
- Regulating Human Genetic Tests: Ten Key Questions 1st April 2003
- Genovations Genetic Test Kits 1st July 2002
-
Briefing 18: Genetics and 'Predictive Medicine': Selling Pills, Ignoring Causes.
1st May 2002
- MPs' Briefing: Human Genetics No. 2 - Unregulated Genetic Testing on the High Street and the Internet 1st April 2002
- Genetic testing on the High Street 1st March 2002
- Press Releases
- GeneWatch PR: Regulation needed to prevent human genome from becoming massive marketing scam 29th October 2007
- GeneWatch PR: Pre-election survey of political parties' views on GM foods and human genetic testing 31st March 2005
- GeneWatch PR: A sales pitch not science - Oxford University attacked for marketing of misleading 'nicotine addiction' gene test 4th January 2005
- GeneWatch PR: GeneWatch UK Welcomes New NHS Guideline for Familial Breast Cancer 23rd June 2004
- GeneWatch PR: GeneWatch UK response to the Human Genetics Commission's 'Genes Direct' report. 9th April 2003
- GeneWatch UK: GeneWatch UK welcomes advice to ministers to regulate genetic tests. 5th February 2003
- GeneWatch PR: GeneWatch UK response to the Human Genetics Commission's announcement 16th July 2002
- GeneWatch PR: High-street stores reject Sciona's human genetic testing 7th June 2002
- GeneWatch PR: Leaked document exposes Government failure to regulate human genetic tests 4th June 2002
- GeneWatch PR: Body Shop's Genetic Tests Misleading and Unethical 13th March 2002
- Newspaper articles
- The Daily Mail: Expensive DNA tests are 'no more accurate than horoscopes' (2nd July 2008)
- The Mercury News: Genetic-testing business all but unregulated (28th June 2008)
- The New York Times: Gene testing questioned by regulators (26th June 2008)
- MedPage Today: Guidelines suggested for Direct-to-Consumer gene tests (25th April 2008)
- Forbes.com: States crack down on online gene tests (18th April 2008)
- Associated Press: Gene testing stirs medical debate (12th April 2008)
- Canadian Press: Market for personal gene scans questioned despite big backers (29th March 2008)
- The Guardian: DNA test website raises accuracy fears (22nd January 2008)
- The Guardian: Genetic tests branded a waste of money (1st December 2007)
- BBC: Firm offers online DNA analysis (16th November 2007)
- International Herald Tribune: US government report says better regulation needed for genetic testing (6th November 2006)
- New Scientist: Genetic testing: an informed choice? (6th October 2007)
- New Scientist: Beware gene screening advice (Editorial, 6th October 2007)
- Guardian article: Genetic medics build high hopes
- Observer article - Scientists attack 'flawed' test for smoker's gene
- Observer article - Gene test to help you beat death sparks row on ethics
- Guardian article - Public misled by gene test hype
